Cascade versus PID control
The difference between cascade and PID control lies mainly in their structure and the way they address process disturbances.
A standard PID (Proportional, Integrating, Differentiating) control uses one control loop to control a process variable (e.g. temperature, pressure or level). The PID controller continuously adjusts the output (e.g. controlling a valve, pump or heating element) to keep the process value as close as possible to the desired setpoint.
A cascade control uses two or more PID controllers connected in series. The main controller (master) thus monitors the primary process variable and sends its output as a setpoint to the secondary controller (slave), which manages an intermediate process variable. This allows the secondary controller to react faster to disturbances, keeping the master controller more stable.
Characteristics
PID control
Cascade control
Numer of controllers
1
Min. 2
Reaction speed to disruptions
Slower in complex processes
Faster thanks to secondary controller
Complexity
Simple
Advanced, requires more settings
Applications
Simplified processes
Complex systems with intermediate process steps
Example
Regulating final temperature in oven
Control of both product temperature and control
of heating elements in an oven
At JUMO we apply cascade controls in various industrial processes, using f.e. JUMO DICON touch, JUMO meroTRON and JUMO variTRON